Carol: Ineffectual art that doesn’t connect.

Carol tells the story of a young photographer by the name of Therese Belivet (Rooney Mara) who meets a beautiful, glamourous but troubled older woman Carol Aird (Cate Blanchett). They both fall in love. And I’ve no idea why so many people fall in love with this movie.

Carol is one of the more disappointing films that I’ve watched this year. It’s subject matter is smothered by it’s own art to the point that it doesn’t really connect at all. When watching Carol, I was often hoping the film would develop its scenes into something more rooted and relatable, but only found it to be more obscure. Todd Haynes relies alot on shooting long drawn out shots of close-ups to convey to us the conflicts within his characters. But it has an inert feeling, scene’s are just waiting to have life injected, after which it dissipates into a vacant place where nothing more profound can be gleaned from it.

It’s not all bad. There were some nice moments like when Therese tinkers with the toy train in the store and the build-up to her mesmerizing first encounter with Carol Aird (Cate Blanchett). It was so charged with an undercurrent of infatuation and a prescient sense of a taboo love in a conservative time. To give the film credit, it does actually try its best to expand on its themes. In one passionate scene, Therese and Carol engage in an intimate moment which leads to sex. Here, the scene’s soft sounds complement the slow and yet increasingly intense atmosphere. Again, the film shoots the two lovers in close proximity, as if they were lost in the own paradise far away from the real world. A few more scenes are also like this; They’re beautiful, have nice tempo and are thematically consistent.

carol-image-rooney-mara-cate-blanchett

But what’s such a let-down is the fact that Todd Haynes’ painfully slow and overtly-subtle style in general, waters down the emotional grip of his best scenes. In my view, there’s just too much he tries to do with too little. Carol is at its best when zooming in on the interactions between its characters but becomes a languid and distant picture when shooting static shots of static images. It’s as if the film wanted us to look at frames of still life and close-ups of blank faces, and somehow be able to derive some sort of profound understanding and feeling.

carol therese

I’m kind of baffled by the character arc of Therese as well. Whereas I thought Cate Blanchett’s Carol was someone whose journey was complex and enlightening (both for her and for the audience), Therese’s ride from start to finish was literally just a ride. Yeap. She just sat there in the figurative vehicle of life’s direction and allowed it to decide the course of her fate. Therese’s self-doubt when she asks Carol if she should have left before Carol and her husband had gotten into a fight may be interpreted as an innocent girl’s conflict between id and super-ego. Sure, it would be perfectly fine to have a character whose true and innocent desires are pure but goes against the traditional lifestyle/expectation that has been imbued in her by society. But this self-guilt extends to an even greater degree of solemn passiveness when she constantly apologises to Carol and saying that it was all her fault after their sexual encounter. Her passiveness makes her kind of flat. In another scene, she’s seen lying down at the back of Abby’s (Carol’s friend) car on Carol’s direction. Again, she remains a pitiful curled up figure whose personality is now virtually non-existent. Using metaphorical language, Carol was the photographer while Therese was the camera; We only get to see the meaningful progression of Carol as she reflects on her life while Therese simply takes in everything while initiating nothing significant of her own.

carol blank therese

It goes without saying that this is the fault of the direction and not with Rooney Mara. Even with the lack of characterization on script, she still manages to shine in some moments. Her sense of curiosity and wonder is something that she pulls off really well and is befitting of her symbol of innocence. Rooney Mara’s Cannes award for Best Actress is puzzling to me, but perhaps a greater testament to how well she played a mediocre character given to her. The film though, is ineffectual and has a style that adorns itself with the subtle and the static. This makes for a film whose tempo is so distant and faint that not even it’s most passionate scenes can lift it above its flaws.

Rating: 6/10

 

Images courtesy of Number 9 Films, Killer Films, Film4 Productions, The Weisnstein Company and StudioCanal

 

 

Advertisements

13 Comments Add yours

  1. An interesting read! Great to read a completely different take on the film! Feel free to check out my review and let me know what you think: https://theaspiringfilmcritic.wordpress.com/2015/12/13/carol-2015-%E2%98%85%E2%98%85%E2%98%85%E2%98%85%E2%98%85/

    Liked by 1 person

    1. jwforeva says:

      Sure!! Thanks for checkin out my blog 🙂

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Thanks for reminding me about the film ‘Carol’. I have seen this on numerous billboards in London, and I will definitely watch it. I will definitely come back to your review when I have 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

    1. jwforeva says:

      Sure, no prob! Tell me how you feel about it when you do! 🙂

      Liked by 1 person

      1. I will do. Thanks 🙂

        Like

  3. YES! THANK YOU! I completely agree 100% with everything you’ve written here. I’m not grasping the overwhelming praise from everyone. It’s a visual feast, but that’s about all.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. jwforeva says:

      Seems like I’ve finally found someone who thinks its all flair and not much substance haha

      Like

  4. ruth says:

    “…long drawn out shots of close-ups to convey to us the conflicts within his characters” Heh, it seems that a lot of filmmakers use this style and think that arthouse films should be cryptic. I love Blanchett but this sounds pretty tedious that I still haven’t been compelled to see it.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. jwforeva says:

      Hi Ruth!! Sorry for the late replies 😦 Been a little busy. Yeah, but I have nothing against art-house though, as long as it does something. Carol and a few other films seem to think shooting still scenes for an eternity is supposed to have some profound meaning. (In the same grain, I hated the assassin).
      Still I think you might wanna give it a go, who knows maybe you’d like it? XD

      Like

      1. ruth says:

        Ha! I didn’t like The Assassin either, nearly fell asleep! Btw I included your LA Confidential review on one of my community links post 😉

        Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s